Particularize Books Conducive To Understanding the Times: The Collision of Today's Competing Worldviews
| Original Title: | Understanding the Times: The Collision of Today's Competing Worldviews |
| ISBN: | 0936163003 (ISBN13: 9780936163000) |
| Edition Language: | English |
David A. Noebel
Hardcover | Pages: 510 pages Rating: 4.1 | 422 Users | 47 Reviews
Interpretation Concering Books Understanding the Times: The Collision of Today's Competing Worldviews
Newly revised and updated with two more worldviews surveyed: Islam and Postmodernism! This book is a landmark guide to understanding the ideas and forces that are shaping our times. From Christianity to Islam to Humanism to Marxism to the New Age to Postmodernism, Understanding the Times provides Christians with a readable, comprehensive treatment of the most significant religious worldviews operating in Western Civilization.
Specify Epithetical Books Understanding the Times: The Collision of Today's Competing Worldviews
| Title | : | Understanding the Times: The Collision of Today's Competing Worldviews |
| Author | : | David A. Noebel |
| Book Format | : | Hardcover |
| Book Edition | : | Anniversary Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 510 pages |
| Published | : | January 1st 2006 by Summit Press Co (first published 1991) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Nonfiction. Religion. Theology. Christian. History |
Rating Epithetical Books Understanding the Times: The Collision of Today's Competing Worldviews
Ratings: 4.1 From 422 Users | 47 ReviewsWeigh Up Epithetical Books Understanding the Times: The Collision of Today's Competing Worldviews
Even better than the first edition with the added worldviews that are covered. A must read to understand the worldviews of today.I thought this book was a great source for learning about different worldviews, and I enjoyed getting that kind of knowledge. However, I just couldn't get past the author's blatant bias. I was annoyed with how he acted as though he was just going to teach readers what they need to know about the different worldviews, and then spent half the book arguing the worldviews. In any case, if you plan on reading this book, I highly recommend going into it with the view that the writing it not purely--or
Well researched and I would say I found this book interesting (hence the 3 stars) but Mr. Noebel's bias (and somewhat sanctimonious perspective) is evident, particularly in his chapter summaries. He makes huge leaps of logic with what appears to be an intent to create fear (for example, he actually infers that secular humanists, are not opposed to pedophilia. Okie dokie. He lost me right there). I think it would be helpful to go to the original sources rather than take the summaries at face
This is an excellent introduction to the prominent worldviews of today. The first edition published in 1991 was terrific, but this edition was updated to include three additional major worldviews (Islam, Cosmic Humanism, and Postmodernism). The book lays out the basic understandings of each worldview as they relate to ten major categories: theology, philosophy, ethics, biology, psychology, sociology, law, politics, economics, and history. Obviously it can't go in depth into all the variations
Very good, very fair to all worldviews. Incredibly logical and precise, exposing fallacies and inconsistencies in such worldviews (I.e. The inability for humanism to believe in consciousness, and therefore if everything is in fact material, mental decisions are based on natural force, and no free will exists, clearly which is illogical). I do think the biggest issue for me with this book is that it treated the followers of worldviews as all philosophers. Just because someone is, say, a humanist,
I mainly agree with this book and think there is alot of good information in it (I did read the whole thing). However, it is somewhat long and dry, and I think that is just too much effort for the "prize" of David Noebel's opinions. If you really want to know something about philosophy and "worldviews," go read original works and come to your own conclusions. Even if your conclusions are the same as Noebel's, it is better to come to them on your own, rather than through secondhand commentary on
Not bad for a run-of-the-mill apologetics book. There is quite a bit in here to digest. Not a lot of depth, but a whole lot of breadth. This volume covers six different world-views and about 12 or 13 different world-view issues. Great for a high school apologetics class, but not challenging enough for college level. There was also quite the range of evangelical and reformed thinkers that contributed to this. The biggest let-down for me was that there was no section on education. It was touched
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.